Chapter one titled, “Partnering” discussed the pedagogy of
partnering. The guiding questions for
this chapter are: 1. What works in the
classroom today? What needs changing? 2. Can
we see students differently? Can we
achieve mutual respect? 3. What is
partnering? What are the teachers and
student roles?
The chapter discussed how direct instruction
is an ineffective way of teaching because today's 21st century students need
more than just lecturing, talking and explaining. Teachers need to find other ways to engage
students in the learning process. The
chapter went on to explain how today's students are social, energetic, and
technological advanced. Students are like rockets taking off and flying at an
advanced speed rather than trains on a track.
What works in the classroom today, are teachers who respect students as
individuals, group work, sharing and hearing ideas from their classmates. Because students operate and learn at a
faster pace, students today need teachers who are able to find other ways to
engage students and make them responsible for their own learning.
To see students differently, teachers,
as rocket scientist, must know that in addition to a fast paced learning environment,
they must also know that their students are headed for a future place that even
we as teachers can't see. Teachers must
help students learn on the fly and adapt and relate in a positive and
responsible manner accordingly. The
chapter discusses the need for mutual respect among teachers and students. Chapter one also discusses how mutual
disrespect prevents effective learning and partnering, while mutual respect
must come from both sides of the desk. Examples
that illustrate this concept are schools that adopt themes and mottos, such as,
"We are all learners as well as teachers."
Partnering is the 21st century way of
working together to produce and ensure student learning. The author further defines partnering as:
letting students focus on the part of the learning process that they can do
best, and letting teachers focus on the part of the learning process that they
can do best. Partnering is the very
opposite of direct instruction. In
Partnering, the teacher gives his or her students a series of questions to be
answered. It is up to the students to
answer the questions based on group work, technology and other resources. The student becomes the researcher, expert,
thinker/sense maker, world changer, and self-teacher. The teacher's role in partnering is: coach
and guide, goal setter/questioner, learner/designer, and abandoning total
control for controlled activity. Other
factors contributing to successful partnering are: peer roles, peer-to-peer
teaching, and partnering parents. All
three roles can be an effective tool for partnering teachers. Students speak the same learning language and
they prefer to learn from their peers.
Peer-to-peer teaching fosters: responsibility, opportunity, and
respect. Parents are key factor for
success in partnering. Because parents expect their students to be taught as
they were, direct instruction, they may feel left out or not included in the
partnering process. Teachers and the
school administration must keep parents in the loop and communicate partnering
pedagogy. Teachers may want to try
partnering pedagogy, but are often nervous or intimidated by a principal who is
not open to new ideas. Principals and
school administration must give strong support for partnering pedagogy in order
for it to be successful in the classroom.
My
experiences with the partnering pedagogy are with training adult learners.
When adults have to attend
professional development training, it is something that is required of them and
therefore, they are not enthusiastic and they feel training is a waste of their
time. I use partnering, case based, and
problem solving learning to create an environment that creates excitement and
peer collaboration.
A very thorough overview of the chapter! I think partnering is a great concept, and I think most teachers would agree. What happens when students bring very little knowledge of a subject to class, though? Or if students are disengaged throughout the class period. It's hard to be a one sided partner. (I don't know the answer to this either, maybe you can help me!)
ReplyDeleteGood questions Patsy!
ReplyDeleteI think when a student brings very little knowledge of a subject, of course he or she is not going to tell you. Should the teacher, when introducing a new subject to the class take a poll? Or, some kind of pre-test to measure prior knowledge.
If a student is disengaged throughout the whole class period, and this is a constant behavior, I would seek to find out what is going on in the child's personal life.